WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2006-12-31 Time: 00:00:00 Posted By: Jan
[I spotted this on a German forum. All of the original post was written in German. I ran it through Babelfish. The result is not very good, but there is enough to get a glimmer of understanding.
The bottom line seems to be that though Brazil does not/did not have racial segregation like the USA and South Africa did, that nevertheless, racial differences between white, brown and black people are strongly detectable and that although whites are a minority, they are still better off.
I have heard it said that in Brazil, “whiter” people tend to rise to the top. Though Brazil is not “racist”. The whites rising to the top is the natural tendency there as well. Jan]
Here still another report to the race inequality:
Off: White, Volkmar: IQ case: Intelligence, social structure and politics. Graz: Leopold Stocker 2000, S. 192-194
Jet black Brazilians, who successfully locked a university, are nearly as rare as in Europe gypsy with university formation. In Brazil had 1982 (Silva and hare bellows 1992, S. 83) 14% of the white ones at the age to 24 years one education, but only 1.6% of the black ones of the same age comparable with the Abitur and 2.8% of the brown ones. The black ones remain very often already hanging or sit in the low grades of the general-forming schools and/or visit the school irregularly, so that the usual mixture from social causes and possibly smaller average intelligence would be to be assumed to. At the age of 10 years there is 33%, under the brown ones 35% under the white ones 15% Sitzenbleiber, under the black ones. These differences affect themselves accordingly in the later business life: 15% of the white ones, 30% of the black ones and 36 % of the brown ones (conditions 1988; Silva and hare bellows 1992, S. 122) have a pro head family income, which is under the official poverty border of Brazil, which is fixed with a quarter of the annual minimum income. Have the three-way of this income nevertheless 12.8% of the white ones, but only 2.5% of the black ones and 2.9% of the brown ones. These income differences might be still strengthened by regional differences, because 65% of the white ones live the south and southeast of Brazil in the most fully developed areas. By this circumstances explains themselves perhaps also why brown ones and black one after the data of 1976 only the half income have, even if they have the same education degree (Silva and hare bellows 1992; S. 23). There are also only some further parallels with the statistics of the USA: Like that black ones are less frequently married in Brazil than white ones and have a larger number of illegitimate children (Andrew 1991). In a very large and representative electricity company in Sao Paulo are 6.7% of the white ones in leading positions, but only 0.8% of the black ones, simple workers are during the first attitude on the job 26.2% of the white ones and 52.5% of the black ones (Andrew 1991).
After its self understanding Brazil is a “rassische democracy”, in which – in contrast to the USA or old South Africa – race differences no role are not noticed to play and. Since 1980 race differences do not become with censuses also no more erfasst.”In Brazil give it racial prejudices… If black ones have some difficulties to advance in this country of the rassischen equality then is not at the white ones, but because of them. That was a painful conclusion, but the logic of the rassischen democracy does not permit Ausfluechte. If one accepts Brazil as a country of the equality, then one can attribute the failure of black Brazilians only to its own lack “, then gives Andrew (1991, S. 135) the opinions usual in Sao Paulo again. A white woman to marry, is black one an ideal for many, “black is the symbol of misery and hunger” (P. 178). The founder of the black front of Brazil, A. Veiga DOS Santos seized the existing contrasts, in the words: “the largest enemy of the black ones is the white one, who is a grandchild of black ones”, together (S quotes after Andrew 1991. 178). Which are afraid white Brazil, is the criminality constantly rising particularly under the black one.
Sometimes also in a Hinterzimmer the fear (so e.g. a memorandum of a government advisor of the State of Sao Paulo in the year 1982 is expressed; Andrew 1991, S. 228) that the “rassische democracy” it breaks down and the non–white could understand themselves as a uniform political strength and take over owing to its starting from the year 2000 given numerical superiority power. The danger appears however small, although in crisis periods available. Because of Brazil on the whole oberschicht so far it brought about which each governing class – even in a “communist” country – can dream only or could: The existing social differences are enormous and by rassische differences are even still strengthened. Nevertheless is the by far largest part of the society of the opinion that these differences do not have a great importance and “rassische democracy” exist. (ironically into danger would come if the majority of its democratic weight became conscious. One reduced this danger however in an elegant form of Brazilian political correctness, by not seizing race affiliation statistically any longer.) The economy flourishes and does not grow (if not straight again once a crisis or a small revolution is). One can only recommend the dominant one in South Africa and some other country, sees on Brazil!
Source: http://www.volkmarweiss.de/iq fall brasilien.html