WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2010-04-11 Time: 08:00:02 Posted By: Jan
[I spotted this fascinating piece, on a website this morning, and I want to draw everyone’s attention to it. In his book, “WHITE POWER”, George Lincoln Rockwell, the American NAZI he quotes from Thomas Dixon’s original book, BIRTH OF A NATION – which then became a movie hit.
Rockwell is himself an interesting character. He was a highly decorated Navy Fighter pilot who commanded 3 squadrons and who fought in WWII against the Germans. Rockwell became a NAZI AFTER WWII! In fact he started a NAZI party in America. In the Introduction to the 1996 edition of his book “White Power” they write: “Like thousands of his fellow ex-servicemen, Commander Rockwell came to the sobering conclusion that the United States had fought on the wrong side in the Second World War. Instead of fighting as allies of the godless Soviet hordes to make the world safe for Communism, we should have been fighting alongside our White German brothers and sisters to remove the Bolshevik cancer from the face of the earth.”
Rockwell went on to form the American NAZI Party. He later changed the name to: National Socialist White People’s party. He adopted the slogan: “White man, stand up and FIGHT!”.
As Rockwell’s popularity grew things became more vicious. He was assassinated on 25th August 1967. (The 1960’s seems to have been the age of assassination… everyone who was anti-communist seems to have ended up dead – e.g. JFK, Dr Vervoerd, Rockwell, etc).
Now on page 299 of White Power, Rockwell quotes Thomax Dixon’s book, “The Birth of a Nation”. It reads: “Education, sir, is the development of that which is. Since the dawn of history the Negro has owned the continent of Africa – rich beyond the dream of poet’s fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a White man showed to him its glittering light. His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud. With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail! He lived as his fathers lived – stole his food, worked his wife, sold his children, ate his brother, content to drink, sing, dance, and sport as the ape! And this creature, half child, half animal, the sport of impulse, whim and conceit, “pleased with a rattle, tickled with a straw,” a being who, left to his will roams at night and sleeps in the day, whose speech knows no word of love, whose passions, once aroused, are as the fury of a tiger – they have set this thing to rule over the Southern people.”
Rockwell also wrote some very insightful things about the White people of South Africa, and Rockwell has been proven completely true, because his logic on this point is very sound. Rockwell basically said that you can NEVER sell to White South Africans (and I would suppose to Whites across Africa actually), the concept that Whites and Blacks are equal. He explained why (and his logic is completely correct). I need to post several of his pages and will do it later.
What Rockwell said in essence is this, (and this is of extreme importance to future American politics too): White Liberalism is inversely proportional to your distance from the nearest blacks! (That is my basic summation of it). In short he says: If you live in Cananda and never see a black person, you’ll be keen to be a liberal and to believe that blacks are equal to you. But the more you live among blacks, the more you realise this cannot possibly be true.
On page 295 Rockwell wrote: “And in areas where there are more Black than White people, as in Mississippi, you will find tremendous resistance to Blacks, and thorough understanding of the primitive savage and utterly different natures of these inferior specimens of humanity.
Unless this direct correlation of a low opinion of Negroes whereever they are many Negroes is the result of the interiority of the Negroes themselves, you must conclude that somehow, almost all the people in South Africa are “bigots”, almost all the people of the U.S. South are “bigots”, and now, almost all the people who live in the big cities of the North are also “bigots”.
Rockwell basically said that the more white people come into contact with black masses, the more whites resisted blacks because the whites realised that the blacks are inferior. Rockwell even gave examples of towns in America where this happened.
Now this conclusion applies to the “white bigots” of Africa. But it has a very important implication for America itself. As Whites in America become a minority, they should in fact BECOME MORE RACIST TOO. That means that racism will be on the rise in America over the next 100 years. President Obama may be the first spark of a much bigger fire to come.
Rockwell made an interesting argument and I don’t know if this is supported by history. He claimed that Whites built the great ancient cultures in Egypt and Greece and that these Whites then interbred with non-whites, the civilisations then went backward and those civilisations collapsed. I cannot say if his argument is exactly true, BUT IT MIGHT HAVE SOME TRUTH IN IT, and I think people need to look into it.
The Eastern Roman Empire later became the Byzantine Empire and finally the Turkish Empire. That Empire lasted over 1,000 years and its racial makeup was completely transformed during that time. So it might be an example of this.
In fact, there could be a thread of history worth investigating to see if this has happened many times in the past. For example: Are the Italians of today, the same racial mix as the Romans were?
I once read a fascinating piece which I could never find again, which made the same argument for the collapse of Portugal as a world empire. It basically stated that the Portguese were brilliant and they were incredibly successful and then the Portuguese began having sex with blacks. It said that Portuguese women kept black men as sex pets and that the Portuguese “bred themselves into inferiority”. Now Portugual is the poorest nation in Europe and the Portuguese people have that darkish skin colour.
I have often wondered how the Romans changed, and surely the Italians are not really the same as the Romans. Notice this also: A nation rises, becomes great, collapses and shrinks AND NEVER BECOMES GREAT AGAIN. Every nation in Europe became great once, and almost all of them, never became great again, except for the very largest.
There are some interesting questions to dig into in history. The Greeks played a major role in many places, including among the Romans, even after they had lost their own power. History is rich with fascinating possibilities and still a myriad of unanswered questions. The rise and fall of nations has mystified me for a long time, and I wonder if the answers are there… just within reach, but we’ve never quite dug deeply enough. Jan]
e.tv screening of old racist US film to go ahead
April 11, 2010
By Bianca Capazorio
Despite strong racial tensions in South Africa at the moment, e.tv will go ahead and air The Birth of a Nation, a 1915 film characterised by extreme racism and once used as a recruiting tool for the Ku Klux Klan in the US.
e.tv said this week that the film had been part of its inventory since 1999, and the decision to air it came because the channel’s right to broadcast the film expired at the end of the month.
Channel spokesman Vasili Vass said this week that the free-to-air channel compiled its TV schedules three months in advance and so the timing of the film was coincidental.
“There is no link between Eugene Terre’Blanche’s murder and the airing of The Birth of a Nation,” said Vass.
The Birth of a Nation, a three-hour silent film based on two novels by Thomas Dixon, tells the story of two families living on either side of the Mason-Dixon line, separating the North and South of the US during the civil war.
It controversially shows the KKK as heroes, while black Americans are portrayed as villains and criminals.
The film caused controversy when it first opened, with black civil rights groups protesting against it. A Wikipedia article on the film states that riots broke out in several American cities after its release, and caused several incidents of racial intolerance.
Despite this, the film did exceptionally well at the box office, holding the record for the most popular film in history until 1937, when it was overtaken by Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
In 1993 it was voted into the American National Film Registry and five years later was named as one of the Top 100 American Films by the American Film Institute.
The film was lauded for its pioneering contribution to cinema, using camera techniques such as deep focus, jump cuts and facial close-ups for the first time.
“The Birth of a Nation, directed by DW Griffiths, has been called the first blockbuster and is considered to have broken ground using the latest technical advancements of the time.
“The film is controversial for its portrayal of racism and, given the age of the movie and its historical context, it has been scheduled at 3.10am,” Vass said.
The film will be shown next Sunday. It bears a parental guidance age restriction.
Source: http://www.tonight.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=5424986