Categories

Sudan: Civil Society Urges Obama to Adopt New Peace Strategy

WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.

Original Post Date: 2009-05-01 Time: 10:00:03  Posted By: Jan

Three prominent American civil society advocacy groups have marked President Barack Obama’s first 100 days in office by issuing an open letter calling on him to build a coalition with China, the Arab League, the African Union and Europe with the objective of developing a set of “carrots and sticks” to bring peace to Sudan.

“A global consensus exists for peace in Sudan, even if there is not agreement on the best path to achieve this goal,” say the groups in their letter. “What has long been missing in Sudan is America’s strategic leadership.”

The letter was written by “Enough”, a project of the Center for American Progress which campaigns against genocide and crimes against humanity, the Save Darfur campaign and the Genocide Intervention Network.

The groups urge Obama’s special envoy for Sudan, Major General Scott Gration, to build “a multinational coalition of countries with significant leverage… [A] reliance on bilateral diplomacy will provide Khartoum the opportunity to play one party off against the other, as it has historically done with great success.”

At the same time, the groups advocate developing “unilateral and multilateral carrots and sticks” to press for a settlement of what they describe as Sudan’s “multiple, interlocking conflicts” – the war Darfur, the proxy war between Chad and the Sudan, the difficulties between North and South and the “dangerously-neglected” situation in the east.

On Darfur, the groups say the African Union/United Nations mediator, Djibril Bassolé, should take the lead in pursuing peace talks already in Doha, Qatar, backed by a small group of countries with influence.

“We believe that this inner circle should consist at a minimum of the United States, United Kingdom, France, China, and Egypt,” the groups say. “An outer circle group of countries and multilateral organizations (UN, AU, Arab League) should also be engaged in a formal manner to discourage spoilers, and other key nations such as Russia, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, South Africa would need to be thoroughly consulted.”

Outlining its proposals for “sticks”, the groups suggest that if President Omar al- Bashir and his ruling party block peace, they should face “a series of escalating costs,” including diplomatic isolation, targeted sanctions, an expanded arms embargo, and, “if necessary to stop massive loss of civilian life, eventual targeted military action.”

The largest “carrot” the U.S. could offer would be the normalization of relations. “Removal of certain unilateral sanctions and penalties could be undertaken in response to verifiable changes on the ground in Darfur and the South. Full normalization should only occur once the Sudanese government adheres to its obligations under various peace agreements. Any negotiating process must be guided by the reality that Khartoum has a long history of grabbing carrots, then failing to follow through on commitments.”

Read the letter in full

Original Source: allAfrica.com
Original date published: 1 May 2009

Source: http://allafrica.com/stories/200905010303.html?viewall=1