WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2004-06-23 Posted By: Jan
From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Date & Time Posted: 6/23/2004 11:26:37 AM
S.Africa: Alleged Mercenaries – Judge made 22 mistakes
=”VBSCRIPT”%>
From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Date & Time Posted: 6/23/2004 11:26:37 AM
S.Africa: Alleged Mercenaries – Judge made 22 mistakes
|
[The question is: Did he make these mistakes because he an incompetant Affirmative Action Judge – or did he make these mistakes because it results in the result the ANC govt wants? Its worth pondering… Jan] Pretoria – Judge-president Bernard Ngoepe made no less than 22 legal, factual and evidence-related mistakes in the ruling in which he denied the application of 70 South Africans being held in Zimbabwe, against the government. Court documents in which the 70 are applying to the Constitutional Court for permission to appeal against Ngoepe’s ruling, mention the mistakes. The men are being held on suspicion that they are mercenaries who were on their way to Equatorial Guinea where they planned to overthrow the government of President Obiang Ngueso in a military coup. They want the South African government to intervene to prevent their extradition to Equatorial Guinea on the grounds that they would not receive a fair trial in a foreign county. Ngoepe was accused of, among other things, not giving enough weight to the supremacy of the constitution. He was also criticised for finding that the constitution was not applicable across the country’s borders. He said there was not enough evidence that the men would in fact not receive a fair trial in Zimbabwe or Equatorial Guinea (“despite eight reports to the contrary”). He also said they had given up their constitutional rights to dignity, life, freedom and security when they crossed the border. Alwyn Griebenow, the men’s lawyer, said in a sworn statement accompanying the documents that Ngoepe had “overwhelming evidence” available that showed that they would not receive a fair trial in Zimbabwe or Equatorial Guinea. He said: “The 70 men’s constitutional right to life is under threat.” The government – including the ministers of justice, safety and security, intelligence, home affairs and foreign affairs, as well as the national prosecuting authority have to react to the documents before Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson will decide whether to allow the appeal. Source: News24.Com |
|
|
<%
HitBoxPage(“NewsView_3514_S.Africa:_Alleged_Mercenaries_-_Judge_ma”)
%>