Categories

S.Africa: Who killed Eugene Terreblanche? I say the ANC killed Eugene Terreblanche, as a prelude to Julius Malema starting a Race War

WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.

Original Post Date: 2010-04-12 Time: 05:00:01  Posted By: Jan

[I wrote about this some days ago and people massively agreed with me but let me say a bit more. For more, see: S.Africa: EXTREMELY IMPORTANT: The Murder of Eugene Terreblanche was DEFINITELY a Planned Assassination…. Jan]

Let me say this, if you will study the circumstances around which ET died, its really easy to see what was going on:-
o For months Julius Malema was attacking whites and the situation was being inflamed more and more daily.
o I did mention that 2 days prior to ET’s murder, I was already watching this and was planning to write an article (which I still haven’t done) – it was that obvious.
o On the weekend of ET’s death Malema was out of the country (in case of Afrikaner anger exploding?) and he was singing Kill the Boer in Zimbabwe.
o Remember I mentioned Zuma was behind the murder and violence aimed at Black Zimbabweans.

When people plan a military/political campaign they can’t know the responses of people exactly, but they do research and they work on the plan that is most likely to work. So if you were planning to make serious move you need to think through what actions to take. Violence is not something easy to use. If you want to kill someone… who do you kill? And why? And what is the benefit you hope to achieve from it? So when you plan something you need to think things through.

In this case, any military/political planners – since you can’t run a military campaign these days without a MASSIVE propaganda operation running in parallel… must have thought how the violence and the propaganda and the politics would fit together.

So first you go and kill someone, then you have to have your propaganda ready for how you will portray the murder so that you score points out of it. Then you need to have your political moves ready, and so forth.

But planning campaigns is really difficult and even more so in this modern age where time and distance no longer matter. In many ways, ET was the logical choice in a campaign that had as its goal a move on the AFRIKANERS…

If you have a guy who is known for wanting to fight you, and you know 70,000 people can rally around this guy… you go and kill him. In that sense, you’ve decapitated the Afrikaner ability to fight back. You’ve killed their “general” and now they don’t know what to do.

It could easily be that DECAPITATION OF FUTURE AFRIKANER LEADERS WILL BE A PART OF FUTURE ANC MOVES ON AFRIKANERS. Look at Mugabe. When Tsvangirai stood up to him he tried to kill him multiple times. Same thing here.

And the logic is basically: If we take out their top guy, then we can strike fear and panic into their ranks, they’ll be leaderless, they’ll be panicked and then we can do with them what we want.

As far as I’m concerned ET was the perfect choice by the ANC in preparation for a MASSIVE RACIAL/GENOCIDE OFFENSIVE AGAINST THE AFRIKANER. But… military plans are tricky… and they can easily go wrong. In this case, the reaction of the Afrikaners themselves and the world did not quite work out according to the original plan. This means, the ANC now has to revisit the plan, look at the new facts and decide:
(a) Do we continue with the plan? If so, then how?
(b) Do we abort?

I assume they’re busy with (a) doing damage control and trying to extricate themselves out of a situation they had not foreseen and trying to get the propaganda right so that ET is properly smeared.

Decapitation and assassination is a game as old as history.

We can sit and discuss many other options, but this is one line of enquiry. It is too bad… we will NEVER see this murder being investigated for its links back to Julius Malema. So sad… because I will bet you this was an ANC operation signed off by President Jacob Zuma himself.

I posted these comments recently with regard to the rumours that he was a homosexual rapist and paedophile. But its worth more thought:-

The mere fact that the story changes already indicates lying and deception.

The facts are the facts… no matter how improbable. If that’s what happened… that’s what happened.

The moment stories change… then they are LYING. Chances are, the new story is a lie and the old story was a lie too.

As we said on day 1: Eugene Terreblanche was ASSASSINATED. This was most likely an ANC-instigated political hit.

The military/political logic behind it would have been: We hit the most militant white guy… then the rest of the whites all sit back and cower in fear. We take him out and we knock their fight out of them on day one.

Since he’s the most hated… they would have said: We then take this guy, with his Hitler-like flag… and the whole world will applaud us and scream hatred at the whites…

Then in phase 2, we can start murdering the Whites and everyone will carry on applauding.

There is a lot of sound logic as to why ET was the perfect Afrikaner to murder, and the ANC would have been able to continue on with Malema and Kill the Boer. I bet you this was a plot to strike the first blow… (as Mugabe always does) and to start a genocide. But the plan has not quite unfolded in that way.

So they will have to think up new lies and new approaches and plot new things, perhaps even murder someone else. Watch this space.