WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2010-04-06 Time: 05:00:01 Posted By: Jan
A friend of mine, who had studied biology at university actually made an interesting point the other day.
He told me that there’s on thing about evolution which he can’t understand.
You will have heard of the “Cradle of man” and all the amazing fossil discoveries at the Sterkfontein caves just outside Johannesburg…
In fact, they are about to announce a new discovery and President Jacob Zuma will even be involved.
Well… my friend was saying to me he can’t understand why they keep on portraying South Africa as the place where all humans started. It doesn’t make sense.
They are discovering human-type fossible of 2 to 2.5 million years old here… BUT… there are older fossils in Kenya… in Chad, and elsewhere in North Africa.
My friend remarked that this is kind of silly. What exactly does this mean? Does it mean humans started elsewhere in the north, moved South to South Africa, then realised they were going in the wrong direction and then moved back north again? We laughed.
But the serious issue to me is: Why is South Africa marketed as the cradle of all human civilisation when there are older fossils elsewhere? Then we are NOT the cradle of human civilisation any more.
Or is this just South Africa’s great hoax on a par with Global Warming?