WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2008-12-16 Time: 03:00:16 Posted By: Jan
This article is in response to the comments by ‘Afrikaner Lies’ on this article: http://localhost:81/acarchive/articlevw.php?R… This person is making some very popular claims, none of which are fact and usually the result of the media cartels and liberal world at large to demonize the Boer/Afrikaner. I will demonstrate in this article to utter lack of fact in these claims, and critically provide arguments of fact, fact which can be readilly found by credible sources such as the UN, Encyclopeadias, History books etc – and I welcome readers to follow up on my arguments. I found this article quite easy to write, as it has no factual grounds to it whatsoever, and thus an ‘[un]educate, village trash’ probably half the age of the claimant, can easilly critically evaluate and disprove. The sad truth is that these claims are rampant throughout the world, and yet they can’t be further from the truth-and this I set out to write this article, in order to shed some light on these popular lies set on demonizing the Boers/Afrikaners. Note: I believe that ‘Afrikaner Lies’ is an Australian, and thus my specific analysis and comparison to Australia(ns) and if this is true, I find it extremely hypocritical at the very least. Janolifant
—
How wrong you are, mate!
1: ‘ How many Blacks(Khoi and San) did the Afrikaner/Dutch murder when they first arrived in SA?'.
Firstly, the Khoi/San peoples are not of Bantu/black nationality. The Dutch East India company actually asked the permission of the native san/khoisan to enter the lands and settle it. Unlike the Australians for example, the australians did not ask for permission but simply enacted genocide against the aboriginal peoples (ie. the Black War – yeah, why no outcry!?) whereas the Dutch did NOT exterminate or even attempt to exterminate the native populations-because if they did, then why are they today a minority?
2: ‘Why did the Khoi and San suddenly die out?'.
There is absolutely no proof to back up your suspicion that the Dutch killed off the san/khoisan, and I challenge you to provide at least ONE credible source backing up this un-factual suspicion. In fact, it was the Bantu speaking blacks whom destroyed the san/khoisan-this is historic FACT, I recommend you consult the history books and you will quickly realise that you are making no factual claims. The Bantu’s were moving south and into San/Khoisan territory-once they encountered the san/khoisan they systematically executed them. History proofs this! In fact, if you do your research, you will find that the san/khoisan are very much alive today…who do you think lives in the Kalahari?
3: ‘They quickly forgot they were originally just peasants, farm labourers, village trash’
Once again, how can you call an entire people ‘village trash’? What do you consider ‘village trash’? The Huguenots contained some very prominent and famous ‘village trash’ as you would call them. At least these ‘village trash’ were not convicts (Australia)! The root of the Afrikaner/Boer left Europe because of instability between Catholics and Protestants, whereas today's australians are the true ‘village trash’, the modern convicts of society!
4: They invented a form of bastardised Dutch language
At least they were smart enough to establish a new language which is officially recognized as a unique language (ie. UN reference). The australians and the rest of the ‘new world’ merely remained speaking English, but it was the Afrikaners/Boers whom took it several steps further!
5: ‘ Tens of thousands of Zulus, Xhosas, men, women, and children were killed by them in the early days’
The blacks came from the north and migrated to the south, just as the Dutch. They arrived at the same pieces of territory at relatively the same time. The blacks attacked the whites and thus the whites defended themselves (and doing one hell of a good job, all in the face of superior odds). The popular ideas floating around is that the whites had a killing spree all over Africa. However, this can’t be further from the truth! The whites traded and HELPED the blacks. I recommend you to do your research before making outrageous claims, in regards to this topic, start at researching Piet Retief-the man whom helped the blacks get back their stolen cattle from other blacks-only to be betrayed and killed by the blacks (Dingaan)-the very people they jusst risked their lives for to help!
Across the ocean in australia, the white convicts would soon start initiating all out extermination against the native aborigines.
6: ‘They had no culture, only their ‘Kitchen Dutch’ language’
Once again, you are making outrageous claims which are the opposite of fact. Afrikaner/Boer culture is officially recognized as having their own culture (reference UN). Australians however only have their own semi-convict culture which is irreligious and consists of drinking and whoremongering (research the mothers of australia to be-whom were prostitutes shipped to australia).
7: ‘ British system of armed forces structure.’.
I recommend you listen to the British military anthem…and you will soon discover that they added ‘basterdised Dutch language' to their anthem, namely, Sarie Marais. Why would the British, at that time the most powerful empire- the only true superpower of the period, add ‘basterdised Dutch language' to their military anthem? The reason is because simply put, the Boers/Afrikaners kicked their arses in battle! The Boer war to date has been the most expensive war to ever be undertaken by the British Empire! It took the British nearly half a million soldiers to combat a mere eighty thousand ‘peasants, farm labourers, village trash’-and even that was not enough to brake the British. The British state with all its ‘system[s] of law, British system of road rules and driving on the right, British system of local and regional government, British sports such as Rugby union and cricket, British system of armed forces structure' eventually had to resort to GENOCIDAL CONCENTRATION CAMPS (which wiped out fifty percent of the future Boer population because half of the Boer child/infant population was exterminated). So here is the world's largest and strongest empire, with all its institutions and culture, resorting to murdering women, children and the elderly. Talk about pick on someone your own size!
7.2: In fact they adopted everything British because they had no real educated people. Architects, engineers, scientists, teachers, etc were exported from Britain to build their country.
A small group of nearly 100, set of into the unknown where they set anchor and from nothing, built a modern and competitive country in an unhospitable and dangerous land filled with disease, dangerous wild life and landscape and not to mention ravaging black hordes set on destroying them. And yet, do you think that all this could have been achieved by an ‘[un]educated people'? A people whom came from the ‘Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, France'- nations whom are known for their technical (i.e. engineering-Germany) and intellectual qualities. So arguably the melting pot of these great nations into one produced a strong people, the Afrikaner/Boer. In fact, this is very hard to argue against seeing that British generals confirmed this (once again I recommend you to research this fact) writing almost poetic accounts of the great Boers! Who built the world renown mines in the two Boer Republics (the mines were built before British interest), in which the Republics became such great states that thousands of British flocked to the great Boer Republics. It was this very fact, this jealousy, which made the British declare war on the Boer Republics-all in order to gain a country made rich by an ‘[un]educated people'. I ask the reader, do YOU really think that an ‘[un]educated people' could truly achieve this? A people whom built states to become the shining beacon for all the Southern Hemisphere, and effectively fight the most supreme empire of the day and winning. Could all this be achieved by an ‘[un]educated people'?
8: ‘They only got TV in 1975'
The reason for this is quite simple, CULTURE. The Boer/Afrikaner's culture and especially religion was so strong, that not only did they not need television to keep them entertained, but also because of the filth broadcasted on television. The Boer/Afrikaner is a deeply religious people, and it was agreed that keeping television, pornography etc was the ethical and right thing to do! Look at television today, and try prove me wrong!
9: ‘What did the afrikaner bring to the world? A coil of sausages called boerewors and a twisted pastry strip called Kocksisters!!!!!'
Clearly once again you have not done your research! Next time you hear another one of your obese, beer in hand, in front of television countrymen saved from heart attack, think back to those ‘[un]educated people' whom brought to the world heart transplantation etc. Next time you hear about the lives of soldiers saved by a Buffel Armoured Personnel Carrier in Iraq, think about those ‘[un]educated people' whom created its own ingenious Defence industry-the vehicles which were made decades earlier only still being used by Americans, Australians etc in Iraq today, and saving their lives. The list goes on and on. And for your information, it's called Koeksisters, you should try some.
By: Janolifant
AfricanCrisis