WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2008-04-17 Time: 00:00:00 Posted By: Jan
One of my friends knows an interesting black man who spent a number of years in America and who is well connected in the USA and in South Africa. His name is: Jack Ledwaba. My friend, who will have to remain anonymous, is very interested in politics and personally knew Tokyo Sexwale's Afrikaner wife. Last year, before the ANC voting at Polokwane in December, my friend had a most fascinating discussion with Jack Ledwaba.
My friend was convinced that Tokyo Sexwale was going to succeed President Mbeki as the next President. One day my friend had a discussion Jack Ledwaba. The two of them discussed at length who would be the next President of South Africa. Jack told my friend that it was completely wrong to believe that Tokyo Sexwale would become the next President of South Africa. He went on to explain why the next President would be Jacob Zuma. I won't deal with that since we've been discussing this possibility here on AfricanCrisis since 2006.
What is more interesting to me, is what this man predicted with regard to the CIA and Jacob Zuma. Jack has his own website: http://www.ledwaba.org/Jack is an educated and most interesting fellow and actually talks with something of an American accent even though he is a South African! On his website, Jack used to claim that he was a “consultant to the CIA”. Jack claimed to have at one time acted as a consultant to the CIA regarding South Africa. If you go to his website and click on “Our People”, and you click on his profile, it unfortunately now crashes. What is of interest to us, is how the CIA thinks with regard to South Africa (and Africa).
Jacob Zuma is a populist who is supporting the Far Left's Marxist agenda in South Africa. Essentially, Jacob Zuma will be the President who will front for the Communists. Jack Ledwaba went to great lengths to explain to my friend that the CIA will throw its support behind Jacob Zuma even though he is fronting for the communists. He said that Zuma is a populist and that the CIA supports populists. I find this line of thinking most interesting.
This is something I've been toying with myself, especially in recent days. On a number of occasions this year I have mentioned that the Western world and the USA are basically looking for WINNERS. They support the political WINNERS in various countries. Take UNITA in Angola for example. UNITA used to be communist too. The Chinese supported them. Later UNITA was supported by America for a short while. Then the Americans abandoned UNITA for about 10 years. Then when the Russians and Cubans were getting too militarily powerful in Angola, the Americans came back to support UNITA again. Much later, America switched its support from UNITA to the Communist/Marxist MPLA.
You will find this pattern in American behaviour all over – even in the Middle East. The Americans support outright terrorists at times too. This has always been a mystery to me.
I mentioned that Dr Richard Cummings had discussed the concept of MODERATION, where the CIA will engage “the enemy” and try to turn them and make them more “moderate” and pro-American and pro-Western. You can read about that here: http://localhost:81/acarchive/articlevw.php?R…br>
Just yesterday I was thinking about this Western world support for the BLACK MASSES of Zimbabwe. See: http://localhost:81/acarchive/articlevw.php?R…br>
The day before that, the European Union made a most interesting statement: http://localhost:81/acarchive/articlevw.php?R…They said that “The people of Zimbabwe want change”.
As I view the statements of the British, and the European Union, and the general behaviour of the Americans it appears to me that the Western World has a very simple policy. It is: “Support the Black masses”. If the Black masses want Marxism – then give them Marxism – but try to moderate it. If the Black masses don't want Marxism then support that too. The Western world doesn't seem to concern itself with arguing about the good or bad reasons for change. All they are concerned with is: “WHAT DO THE MASSES WANT?”
The penny dropped with me, also when recently I read a piece written by Lord Carrington who played the major role on the side of the British in helping to install Mugabe. Lord Carrington basically said that “Mugabe is what the masses wanted – ergo they put him in”. That, in a very basic summary is what Carrington's excuse was. The Blacks wanted Mugabe – so they got Mugabe – regardless of what a Communist scumbag he turned out to be. He also ran several other wars in support of terrorists and other Marxists in Africa.
The West, in its inability to understand the minds of Black people, seem to have opted to go for whatever popular sanity or popular insanity may be carrying the day in a particular black African country. So if a country is afflicted by a popular delusional madness, the West supports it. If later the madness gives was to sanity, the West supports that too. To me it is something of a pathetic system which ignores certain fixed values. However, it is not a bad foreign policy. It means the West goes after the masses according to their popular sentiment of the moment.
In Zimbabwe, the masses have seen the light. Suffering has taught them the difference between good and evil.
In South Africa, where the masses do not really know true suffering, like the rest of Africa, the West will support the popular delusional insanity of the current moment – that being Jacob Zuma and the far left.
I did discuss before, that Jacob Zuma met STRATFOR who supply their analyses to the CIA, and STRATFOR liked Zuma. Here is the article where I discussed how Zuma fooled Stratfor: http://localhost:81/acarchive/articlevw.php?R…br>
I found Jack Ledwaba's discussion with my friend most interesting. It has helped to fill in another missing piece which for me, is probably the final missing piece in trying to understand why the American State Department and the CIA behave the way they do. They've come to believe in “the masses” and the will of the masses. They believe that supporting populism is the best way forward for American interests.
Whether this will indeed be the best and wisest way forward for the Western world remains to be seen. I have my doubts.
But for us in southern Africa it helps to explain the actions of the West.
But the Chinese and Koreans have big stakes in Zimbabwe. The Angolan war, which resulted in 3 million dead, was the result of a super-power clash. Russia and Cuba Versus America and South Africa. Perhaps Zimbabwe will be the site of the next super-power clash – when America and the European Union meet up with the Chinese and Koreans. I wonder how many million will die there?
However, it will be a side-show compared to when South Africa's civil war comes. That will be the main show. (For more on that, see: 2008 Report: Russian General’s Analysis of a Future (Terrible) South African Civil War – Assesses current readiness)
Source: http://www.ledwaba.org