WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2008-03-14 Time: 00:00:00 Posted By: Jan
[South Africa must be the only country where entire multi-storey buildings can be hijacked. I mentioned this back in 2005. Here are some articles about it then:-
Amazing: How Black Gangs Hijack entire buildings!!!
Johannesburg: 2 Building Managers shot dead by Building Hijackers
Jhb: Building hijackings: Council feigns helplessness over murders
Finally, the Govt claims it wants to do something about this problem! Let’s see. Jan]
Draft legislation tabled in Parliament on Monday seeks to prevent illegal evictions, but includes safeguards against building hijackings.
According to a memorandum attached to the draft Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Amendment Bill, many buildings, particularly high-rise buildings, have been and continue to be occupied unlawfully, often at the instance of non-owners who then collect rent from the illegal occupants.
The bill proposes the definition of “land” be expanded to include “buildings and structures on land”.
An “unlawful occupier” is defined as someone occupying land without the owner’s consent, or without any other lawful right to occupy it.
The bill also proposes that the principal Act be amended to make arranging an unlawful land invasion – especially on land earmarked for housing development – an offence.
Anyone receiving money for arranging a land invasion will have to repay it and assets bought with this money can be seized and resold.
The law currently makes a distinction between people occupying land for less than six months, and those who have been living on it for longer.
In the former case the law prescribes certain criteria which a court may take into account when deciding whether or not to issue an eviction order.
These include the circumstances surrounding the occupation, the availability of alternative accommodation and the rights of women, children, the disabled and women-headed households.
The Bill seeks to remove the distinction and provide for a single set of criteria to be applicable in all cases of unlawful occupation. –
Source: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?art_id=vn20080313062001311C976186