WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2007-10-04 Time: 00:00:00 Posted By: Lone Wolf
Recently, in the U.S. there has been a meeting of U.S. “secesstionist” movements. Among the recent host of U.S. “secesstionists” is the likes of the “right-wing” League of the South which has closely aligned itself with the Leftist Second Vermont Republic which was founded by former far left professor of Duke University, the likes of Thomas Naylor.
Now what does this have to do with “democratization” one might want to ask? Well, these “secesstionist” movements are asking for greater autonomy in the regions that wish to secede from the U.S. While many of them attempt to paint themselves as “alternative right-wing” movements, the old Soviet-backed Marxist secesstionist movemenets are equally much involved pushing to secede from the U.S. Take for an example, the likes of the Republic of Afrika, a black Marxist group which demands southern U.S. states with high levels of African-American population to secede from the U.S. along with the Black Panthers pushing for secesstion.
A closer look at this practice of “secesstion” exposes its old Soviet rule of “autonomy” in which the likes of Soviet Russia had “independent” Soviet Republics and encouraged the absorbation of more Soviet Republics with such attempts such as an attempt in Germany and also an attempt with Iran with the Persian Socialist Soviet Republic to which was supported by the Iranian Communist Party and the pro-Soviet Tudeh Party started by Iranian Marxists and members of the Soviet Red Army. If this is applied with the U.S., all “independent republics” may certainly try to express themselves to have “different political leanings” but they are in agreement that they will not push for a hardline foreign policy against the Soviet-Sino war machine. This would certainly end up being one of the models for a Soviet America as proposed by the likes of the Communist Party USA which has affiliations with these “secesstionist” movements through the Coalition for Free and Open Elections with such examples of the Constitution Party being supported by the “right-wing” League of the South.
A post-capitalist America with “independent autonomous republics” involved would make it quite easier for a pro-Communist American state to rule over with. This is perhaps another part of why “democratization” is nothing more than another term to push for a Red Revolution as detailed by the likes of Anatoliy Golitsyn. After all, the Soviets managed to use this scheme to make it look like that Soviet Republics are “breaking away”. Why not repeat the process here in America except make “independent autonomous republics” be friendly to an American government friendly with the Communist Party USA.