[Here is as much proof as you need of so many of the things I have been saying for years now. Take heed – people in America and the Western world.

Take special note of exactly what happened here. Chavez is an outright Marxist Communist. Then there is Iran’s leader who is a Muslim enemy of the Western world and Israel. Now look closely how a Communist and a Muslim radical were both invited to the African summit. You would not think these two have something in common, but as I have been writing for years now, you can see all these elements coming together. I have given information for years now to make the case that the Russians and Chinese are also behind the radical Muslims. The Muslim Terrorists and the “Black Liberators” all share a common source of support: Russia and China. These Muslims and Blacks are all coming together to stand against the Western world – not that they are strong – but I just wish to demonstrate what lies in their hearts and souls.

Chavez is an outright piece of communist trash. He is, by the way, very friendly with Robert Mugabe, another piece of communist/terrorist trash.

Yes, the Western world is stunned by this… it shocks the West. Well, remember Mugabe with his “turn East” policy. I did tell you that Mugabe is setting the scene for the rest of Africa.

It appears to me, all the CIA’s Liberalism in Africa is not really working. In the end, the leaders of Africa are giving off some dangerous signals. We whites in Africa have been warning for decades that Africa is going to leave the orbit of Western influence. The battle for the soul of Africa is not over, and if left to themselves these black Africans would turn away from the Western world. Only clandestine CIA & MI6 skullduggery is keeping Africa mildly interested in the west. But I have said that the day may come when Africans will be openly against the Western world.

They quote a professor below who basically talks a lot of nonsense. He sees the obvious and then tries to explain it away. The signals are clear. Don’t listen to all the psycho-babble he engages in, trying to explain that this must not be seen as “anti-Western”. The truth: He is just lying and covering up for the anti-Western stance of black African leaders.

In the news item below, people are not pointing out the OUTRIGHT COMMUNISM contained in the speech of Chavez. Look at this: “In his speech to the summit on Saturday, Chavez urged Africa to seize greater control of its energy resources, describing the low royalties paid by some oil giants as robbery. Chavez has hiked taxes on U.S. oil companies, which he dubbed Count Dracula.”

Now that rubbish which came forth out of Chavez’s mouth is 100% COMMUNISM. That is NATIONALISATION. Bolivia did that the other day. That is a communist attack on the “means of production” – seizing it, as Karl Marx advocated. Nobody is pointing out the outright COMMUNISM seeping through South America and which these South American communists are now trying to encourage in Africa. What Robert Mugabe did to the White Farmers in Zimbabwe is outright communism – nationalisation by another name.

Be warned, all these scumbags are trying to work together against the Western world. They are not your friends. I wish the Liberal idiots in the CIA would wake up to this most obvious fact and start carrying out a more realistic policy in Africa whereby it recognises people by their ideology – in which case they would realise that whites in Africa are 110% on the side of the Western world. There are few few countries left in Africa who are truly pro-Western. In time there may be NONE! Jan]

BANJUL (Reuters) – Two of the world’s most anti-American leaders, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, attended this weekend’s Africa summit in Gambia to the consternation of Western diplomats.

Both lived up to their billing with Chavez railing against U.S. “hegemony” and Ahmadinejad blaming Western greed for “poverty, backwardness, regional conflicts, corruption, illicit drugs.”

The role of West-baiting once fell at AU summits to Libya’s colourful leader Muammar Gaddafi but he has now been welcomed into the Western fold and Libya is soon to be taken off the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism.

So why were outsiders Chavez and Ahmadinejad invited?

The striking presence of such anti-Western figures, particularly the Iranian leader, raised eyebrows among the large number of foreign envoys observing the summit, diplomats said.

One non-aligned ambassador who asked not to be identified said the invitation to Chavez was more understandable than that to Ahmadinejad since Venezuela has AU observer status.

He said the Ahmadinejad invitation was apparently extended unilaterally by Gambian President Yahya Jammeh, and provoked criticism from some countries in the 53-member AU.

But Western diplomats suggested the two invitations may also have been intended to underline Africa’s breakaway from the influence of former colonial powers in Europe.

“At one time the links with Europe were still strong. But in the 21st century Africa wants to show that these links have finally been broken,” one European ambassador said.

AFRICA NOT ANTI-WESTERN

Professor Shadrack Gutto, director of African Renaissance Studies at the University of South Africa, said the presence of Chavez and Ahmadinejad should not be seen as anti-Western.

“The AU is not suddenly turning against the West. These visits were not ideologically decided and there isn’t necessarily an anti-Western aspect to it,” he said.

But he added that it was easier for Africa to assert its independence from the West when meeting in the AU than as individual countries, many dependent on Western funding.

“It does indicate that collectively, as the 53 members of the AU, when they come together the West will not choose for them who they invite or who their friends are,” he said.

“They are saying Africa can have a position that differs with that of the West.”

Gutto suggested that whereas there were strong and logical reasons to invite Venezuela, Ahmadinejad had probably pushed for an invitation to lobby for African support in Tehran’s nuclear standoff with the West.

He said African countries were eager to hear about Chavez’s policies toward Western oil companies.

“Chavez has taken quite a radical line with regard to claiming national sovereignty over natural resources and that resonates with a lot of African countries emerging as substantial producers,” Gutto said.

He said African producers were anxious to ensure they maximised the benefits of their resources and were not being short-changed in contracts with Western oil companies.

In his speech to the summit on Saturday, Chavez urged Africa to seize greater control of its energy resources, describing the low royalties paid by some oil giants as robbery. Chavez has hiked taxes on U.S. oil companies, which he dubbed “Count Dracula.”

Source: Reuters
URL: http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.asp…/p>