Categories

Lion Murder: Why did lions leave "tasty morsel" behind?

WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.

Original Post Date: 2005-03-02  Posted By: Jan

From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Date & Time Posted: 3/2/2005 5:45:09 AM
Lion Murder: Why did lions leave "tasty morsel" behind?
=”VBSCRIPT”%>

Lion Murder: Why did lions leave "tasty morsel" behind?

From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org


Date & Time Posted: 3/2/2005 5:45:09 AM

Lion Murder: Why did lions leave "tasty morsel" behind?

[The Pathologist now points out a fascinating fact: Why did the finger, and only the finger, with the thumb, appear on the crime scene… unscathed… The entire body had been eaten by the Lions… but the finger remained untouched. It also appears, the finger was not on the crime scene when other photos were taken… and when the finger appeared… it was this finger only… that was used to identify the black victim… meanwhile, DNA from the bones, etc… was not used… So… does the finger belong to the same body as the bones on the crime scene?

It looks to me… as I said in the beginning… that now one can see… evidence was planted… to frame this White guy.

I will post another news report on the same issue… because clearly… something is very strange here…

Furthermore, THE CITIZEN newspaper reported that whoever was eaten by the Lions… was already dead… In other words, the whole story about the black man being eaten alive by Lions… is complete junk.

Now we see… other evidence showing… that we don’t even really know whose bones are there… The “body” was identified by using the strange finger… (which it seems lay there for months…?).

I suspected from the beginning that this is largely a propaganda exercise… because of the SA Communist Party, and the ANC being so openly involved…

Whether this White man will get a fair trial is another business.

It does appear as if the White man and two black accomplices murdered another black man… but whether the body in the Lion enclosure is that man… is another thing… There is lots of weirdness in this trial.
Jan]

Why was a “tasty morsel” such as a finger left intact by the lions which attacked Nelson Chisale, a pathologist asked in the Phalaborwa circuit court on Wednesday.

While photographs showed blades of grass between and over other the bone fragments found in the lions’ encampment at Mokwalo White Lion Project, “all of a sudden, the finger lies of top of the grass blades”, pathologist Leon Wagner pointed out to the court.

He is testifying in defence of Mark Scott-Crossley, 37, who is accused with Simon Mathebula, 43, of murdering Chisale, who was viciously assaulted before being fed to lions. Both men have pleaded not guilty.

In previous evidence, the court has heard that all that was left of Chisale was a shaft of human long bones, a skull with no mandible, fragments of rib, vertebrae, pelvic girdle and a finger, his shredded shirt and ripped pair of khaki trousers.

‘Why only that part of the finger and nothing else?’
The finger should have been examined under a microscope to determine whether the edge where it was severed was sharp or torn, Wagner told the court under cross-examination by state prosecutor Ivy Thenga.

While photographs showed that the other skeletal remains had been “eaten virtually clean”, a “tasty morsel such as a finger tip is still intact”.

“How is it possible that small morsel remains behind?” he asked. “Why only that part of the finger and nothing else?”

The controversial photograph of the remains which appeared in Beeld newspaper shortly after the trial began in January, appeared not to include the finger. It was said to be at the police’s fingerprint division.

The question remained why a fingerprint from this was relied on to identify Chisale when DNA testing would have confirmed beyond any doubt the owner of the bone remnants. – Sapa

Source: Independent Online (IOL)
URL: http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click…/p>


<%
HitBoxPage(“NewsView_4440_Lion_Murder:_Why_did_lions_leave_&QUOT;t”)
%>