Categories

Now US Army Officers say exactly what I said…

WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.

Original Post Date: 2005-02-07  Posted By: Jan

From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Date & Time Posted: 2/7/2005 12:55:07 PM
Now US Army Officers say exactly what I said…
=”VBSCRIPT”%>

Now US Army Officers say exactly what I said…

From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org


Date & Time Posted: 2/7/2005 12:55:07 PM

Now US Army Officers say exactly what I said…

[Take a look at this article. Look at what US Army Officers are saying about the insurgency in Iraq. This is *EXACTLY* what I have been saying for months. I’ve been saying that US Forces are really achieving very little in their war against terrorists inside Iraq – and I’ve given exactly the same reasons as these Officers are now mentioning. I have said on many occasions that Fallujah, for example, was a failure because the enemy knew they were coming months beforehand.

A friend in the Middle East wrote to me today, with a quote from Donald Rumsfeld. It was where Rumsfeld was saying how democracy was spreading all through the Middle East, etc. My friend then asked: Is Donald Rumsfeld really this DUMB?

I responded by saying: The answer to your question is simple: This is the same man who did not foresee a guerilla war coming after the conventional war… Therefore… I rest my case. He really is as dumb as you think.

My personal opinion is that those at the top haven’t got a clue what to do. Chances are, if they left the lower-ranking Officers and soldiers to start developing their own tactics, you would see a *LOT* more successes. The troops should be unleashed to do their job.

I think their senior commanders – back in Washington, are out of touch with reality.

I totally concur with the views of the junior and mid-level officers. If they were left to run the war, you’d see the terrorists get wiped out.
Jan]

Officers fault U.S. command for ‘failure to surprise’ in Iraq

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Monday, February 7, 2005
BAGHDAD “ U.S. military sources said combat units have failed to develop effective tactics required to defeat the insurgency in Iraq.

The Abu Dhabi-based Gulf News reported that senior officers from the 82nd Airborne Division have criticized leading military planners for their force protection tactics.

“The result has been a lack of mobility and failure to surprise,” a military source said. “By the time, we arrive at an insurgency stronghold, half the city knows about it.”

The failed U.S. military tactics are based on a strategy for force protection that require the use of armored fortresses, heavy vehicles, heavy weapons and large forces to withstand insurgency attacks, Middle East Newsline reported.

The sources said U.S. commanders have overruled junior and mid-level officers who advocate the development of streamlined light combat units to initiate stealthy attacks on insurgents. They said the commanders have also refused to allow troops to enter Iraqi communities without heavy vehicles and weapons.

“The problem is that we all sit around in our bases and just wait for them to come and blow us up,” another officer said. “It didn’t used to be like that. We used to go out and take the fight to them. I can only think that someone in the Pentagon is scared of what will happen if we start taking casualties.”

More than 1,400 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq since the U.S. invasion of March 2003.

In many cases, the sources said, U.S. commanders have ordered the withdrawal of troops when confronted by insurgents in an effort to reduce casualties. They said such orders have encouraged insurgency attacks.

The officers cited by the Gulf News said the U.S. military must demonstrate its ability to patrol anywhere in Iraq to ensure that the insurgents remain off balance. The sources said that despite nearly two years in Iraq, U.S. military commanders still fall back on tactics that surrender the initiative to insurgents..

“Of course it’s more dangerous for us, but there’s no alternative,” a paratrooper from the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division said. “You can’t catch an insurgent with a tank or helicopter, and you certainly can’t if you’re hiding behind a barricade.”

“All too often we see Americans riding around in armored vehicles or running away when they get shot at,” the paratrooper said. “It sends the wrong message and makes the insurgents think we’re scared of them.”

Another criticism by junior and mid-level officers was the reliance on military fortresses to house and protect U.S. troops. The sources said this has fostered a siege mentality and enable insurgents to operate freely around U.S. facilities.

Copyright (194)Â 2005 East West Services, Inc.

Source: World Tribune
URL: http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/05/b…/p>


<%
HitBoxPage(“NewsView_4314_Now_US_Army_Officers_say_exactly_what_I_”)
%>