WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2004-01-19 Posted By: Jan
From the News Archives of: WWW.AfricanCrisis.Org
Date & Time Posted: 1/19/2004 9:39:05 AM
From France: Advice for Whites on Racism [very good]
[Note. This comes from a French website which is against racism against white people. It has some interesting things in it, like racist rape against white women (something which already happens in South Africa. Criminals don’t just steal, they often rape or kill as part of the act). Obviously the author of this was french and there are some spelling mistakes, etc. However, this makes for a good read. It shows not only that blacks, even in the USA, are more likely to commit race crimes, but it also shows how docile all us whites are when it comes to racial slander against us. The URL is at the end of the page. The website seems to have some interesting things on it. Jan]
Say “anti-white racism”
avoid saying “racism”
and don’t say “reverse racism”
When they want to talk about anti-white racism, many people talk about “reverse racism”. That is a big mistake that actually help spreading racist ideas about white people.
When we talk about “reverse racism” to describe instances of anti-white racism, this implies that there is a norm in racism, and that the norm is white racism. It also implies that there is no such thing as anti-white racism but, rather, that there is a “boomerang” effect in white racism: whites are only victims of their own racism.
That’s wrong to say “reverse racism” and that’s wrong to think the norm is white racism. If there is more white racism than any other racism, this only because whites are more numerous in occidental societies which happen to be their societies. In the United States, for exemple, the FBI hate crime survey have shown that 65 % of hate crime perpetrators are white while 20.4 % of hate crime perpetrators are Blacks. Yet, a census survey shows that whites make up 75 % of the US population while Blacks make up only 12 % of the US population. It should also be stated that instances of anti-white racism are often underplayed in the media and that many whites are not sensitized to identifying and reporting the racism they might be victim of.
In Zimbabwe, where Whites are a minority and Blacks a majority, Blacks are virulently anti-white racists and Zimbabwe’s president Robert Mugabe, led a policy of ethnic cleansing by chasing whites out of the country. There were 500 000 whites in Zimbabwe in 1980. By 2000, there were only 200 000 of them left. After three years of a campaign of terror, there are only 50 000 whites left. Joseph Msika, the vice president of Zimbabwe has publicly stated that “Whites are not Human being”.
The perception that racism is a “white thing” comes from historical reasons. It was in White societies that racism was first debated and talked about. The discourse on racism has been largely shaped by minorities’ ethnocentrist points of view on the matter, and to them fighting racism meant fighting “white racism”. When you talk abour “reverse racism” it only reinforces the idea that the norm in racism is white racism. As a matter of fact, it is better altogether not to say “racism” as well, since for most people, talking about “racism” means talking about “white racism”.
Most people who’ll want you to say “racism” rather than “anti-white racism” are people who never talk about anti-white racism and don’t want to hear about it. Just tell them it’s not because they never talked about it that you shouldn’t.
don’t say “reverse racism”
Avoid saying “racism” which everybody understands as a synonym for “white racism”.
Say “Anti-White Racism”.
Say “a Racist” or “a anti-white racist”
Don’t Say “a victim of racism can be racist”
Sometime, this expression surfaces when some people want to talk about expressions of racism that aren’t expressions of “white racism”.
These people simply have a reluctance to admit that white people don’t hold a monopoly on racism. That is because they hold the racist belief that “white racism” is the norm and they don’t want to part with that belief. As well they have a racist belief: White people, they think, are highly irrational people who can’t think straight; if you tell white people that others people are also racist and that white people might be targeted by racism, they think whites are suddenly going to run out in the streets and kill blacks, asians, latinos or whoever. Of course, they never think that by only presenting whites as racists and by over exposing instances of white racism, they might feed ressentment againt whites… its a striking fact that in the United states, which is allways ahead of europe by ten years on these matters, many anti-white murderers use “white racism” as a justification for their hatred. Just check this on the hate crime page with Ronald Taylor or Negusse Zeleke
So while some people want to talk of, for instance, asian racism, they do it in a way that reinforces prejudices toward whites. They remind people subtly that “whites are the most racist”, that “white racism is the norm”. Just as well, using the word “victim of racism” and talking of an act of anti white racism, they discretely justifie racism toward whites or even toward other people. The “victim of racism” is only racist because it had been made that way by the racism of the ethnic majority (which is most likely to be white). There’s no excuse for white racism, should there be one when a racist belongs to another ethnic group?
People who say “victim of racism can be racist” are Anti-white racists. If a person has been victim of racism in the past, when taht same person is in the act of practicing racism against somebody else, she cease to be a “victim of racism” and she is “a racist”. No matter what happened before.
So stop to help spread racial prejudices against whites with this phony anti-racist discourse. let’s stop to present white racism as the norm in the anti-racist discourse. And lets stop to present it in a way that excuses or justifie anti-white racism.
don’t say “a victim of racism can be racist”
Say ” he, she, they are racists”
or better, say “he, she, they are anti-white racists.”
Say, Racist Hoax
Don’t Say “Fake Hate Crime” or “Hate Crime Hoax”
We are so used to beleive that only white racism exists that when there is no white racism, we think there is no racism at all ! What a stupid idea !
That is exactly what happens when a racist hoax is uncovered! generally a racist hoax is a slander that targets whites. Some clever and manipulativ racists are well aware that in our occidental societies, there is a prejudice that whites are the racists and people who belonged to another ethnic group can only be victims of racism.
Often, they will pretend that their ethnic group or themselves are targetted by white racists. They use this to get sympathie, to get a political benefit or, more often, to cover up a crime. they know that as minorities in a largely white society, they will be faced with people of autority that are very likely to be whites. Yet they also know that , even thought there is an eternal inquisition against white people when it comes to races, whites are not very likely to be racist and will feel unconfortable on a racially charged matter and that, furthemore, they might be eager to show good caracteres. At the least, they expect people won’t dare questionning a “poor persecuted person”, at best, they can expect to get something out of white people sympathie.
Sometime, people discover this was a hoax. the person had staged the whole racism she claimed to be a victim of. And white people are so releived they say this was a “fake hate crime”.
Well, there was a hate crime: Whites, as a group, were slandered. They were specifically targeted because of a prejudice against them. In Fact, Whites were unsed as scapegoats of a moral or financial fraud because they were Whites.
Because there is a close similitude between the anti-racist discourse of minority activists that present “some whites as racists” and the prejudice widespread in minorities that “only and all whites are racists while themselves are righteous can’t be racist type of human beings”, we scarcely noticed that accusing whites of being racist can sometime actually be racist !
So don’t say it’s a “fake hate crime” or it’s a “hate-crime hoax”
Say “it’s a racist hoax”
URL: http://racismeantiblanc.bizland.com/005/07.ht…br>