WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2002-08-10 Published on: ETHERZONE.COM  Posted By: Jan
America’s intellectuals are determined to destroy America, the West and everything the
Western world stands for. But, you know what? They are doing the very thing which people
like Marx and Lenin had hoped would happen.
One of the key methods of destroying a society is to go after the youth. The youth are
impressionable. Their minds are open, and they are looking for values. They are able to
think for themselves, but they lack one thing – the cunning of age.
I have often observed that in any competition between youth and age, age almost always wins,
and there is a reason for it. Cunning comes with age. The old are cunning and sly, and the
youngsters are not. That is why nations will always be ruled by older men. There are some
things you can only learn through experience and practise, and these are normally the more
subtle points of life.
The youth of the Western world, and America in particular, are targets for a war of the
mind. This war is aimed at destroying the youth’s faith in what their society stands for.
The reason for this is that it is the young men who normally carry the burden of war and
the defense of a society. If you can destroy the faith of young men in who they are, and
what they stand for, then you are destroying the defense of that country. Better still,
if you can work on their minds and their loyalties maybe they will even partake in the
destruction of their own society.
America’s youth are suffering from problems which go back to the Vietnam war. Vietnam
was a communist victory in so many ways. Not only was Vietnam a blow to America’s pride,
but Vietnam caused Americans to doubt themselves. The main effect of Vietnam was to cause
dissension inside America and to make Americans doubt America’s greater mission and responsibilities in the
world. It seems to me, from my perspective in Africa, that if America did not suffer such
a heavy defeat in Vietnam, then maybe America would have played a more active role in
countering the spread of Marxism in Africa.
I try, as much as is possible, to try to explain to Americans that they are the victims of
many propaganda games in the world, and that their perception of the world is not really
correct. America is so pivotal in the world, that the misdirection of the perceptions of
Americans is extremely important to the enemies of America. It is a very difficult message to get across, and no doubt everybody
is sure it must be me who is wrong. But I try in my articles to show people the logical
inconsistencies in the world which show clearly, that the message that people are being fed
from the Left of the political spectrum is wrong. It is flawed, and full of holes and
self-contradictions. What I am attempting to do, is to fly in the face of almost everything
which people hear in the Mass Media. I am aware of how propaganda actually works in the real
world, and I can see that there is a never-ending war going on for the minds of people, especially
the youth. But, let me try once again to try to show people what is happening and why.
The first message I have for people in North America (and Europe) is that they are being subjected
to a massive and ongoing wave of propaganda, and whether they realise it or not, it is affecting
them and affecting their decisions and actions. It is making them behave in a way which is not
in their own best interests, or in the best interests of what the Western world stands for, and
ultimately, in the best interests of this planet. Like it or not, Europe and the USA are the
major forces on this planet, and if Europeans and Americans take the wrong turn, it has grave
implications for everyone. Like it or not, but Americans especially, have a tremendous influence
elsewhere. Here in Africa, people look to Americans for moral and intellectual direction. If you
can brainwash Americans, then because of American influence via the media, you can brainwash the
world. This has been happening, and continues to happen.
I would like to quote a few paragraphs from my book, Government by Deception. This
pertains to the Vietnam war, and the effectiveness of propaganda against the American people:-
“Those who doubt the sheer power of propaganda and psychological warfare would do well to remember the Vietnam War. The riots and demonstrations in the USA and around the world were the result of clandestine Russian propaganda against Americans and their military. The propaganda played a key role in demoralising Americans and in making Americans hate their own soldiers. The Russians waged an unrelenting propaganda war across the world as well as inside America. In fact, the GRU (Russian Military Intelligence) played a key role in that propaganda war against America and they believed they were the people most responsible for defeating America. Colonel Lunev, the highest-ranking defector from the GRU had this to say: “While the GRU instructors would not state it directly, they strongly implied that the GRU was responsible for the Vietnamese success Our instructors told us how the GRU influenced the American public. The GRU and the KGB helped to fund just about every antiwar movement and organisation in America and abroad. Funding was provided via undercover operatives or front organisations. These would fund another group that in turn would fund student organisations. The GRU also helped Vietnam organise its propaganda campaigns as a whole” (Author’s emphasis).
He went on to say: “What will be a great surprise to the American people is that the GRU and KGB had a larger budget for antiwar propaganda in the United States than it did for economic and military support of the Vietnamese. The antiwar propaganda cost the GRU more than $1 billion, but as history shows, it was a hugely successful campaign and well worth the cost. The antiwar sentiment created an incredible momentum that greatly weakened the U.S. Military” (10) (Author’s emphasis).
Thus, while America was dropping enormous numbers of bombs, the Russians were working on the minds of people everywhere. As American soldiers were shooting bullets, the Russian agents were working on the minds of the American people. The Vietnamese won, and powerful America lost. This is how the weak defeat the strong, and how communism moves forward by playing on the minds of those whom they wish to defeat.
I must however stress that propaganda and psychological warfare is only effective against those who are not aware of it. Once people are aware of it, they become hardened and it will have less effect. The Western world would do well to learn this lesson.” (Government by Deception, pp 120-121)
In my book I went to great lengths to explain how propaganda, psychological warfare, and even
Brainwashing works in the real world. This is not hocus pocus or “New Age” stuff. It has to do
with the control of knowledge and information. The bottom line is that people behave in accordance
with their perceptions and beliefs. Since America is an extremely strong country (touted as the
world’s only remaining superpower – I’m not so sure of that), it follows that misdirecting its
military may be more important than fighting an overt war against it. America is supposed to be
the land where “free men” rule themselves. This democratic tradition makes America (and the
Western world in general) very susceptible to the views of the masses. If Americans can be
convinced of something, then it will be reflected in the way they vote and in future foreign
policy. So it is important for the enemies of America (Russia and China), to see to it that
America’s military and economic might is misdirected. They cannot confront America openly, so
instead they have spent decades working on its perceptions. If America can be prevented from
helping its friends, while being encouraged to soften its attitude towards its enemies, then
America can help to write its own obituary. This is exactly what has been happening
for the last 30 years.
If you read the revelations of former communists, as I have done over the years, you will
learn amazing and frightening things. People like Fidel Castro firmly believe that the way
to destroy America without firing a bullet, is to work on the youth. You can see this too
in the revelations of Colonel Lunev whom I quoted above. Turn the Youth into a bunch of
peaceniks, and hey presto, you have no army. Better still, turn them into people who hate
their own country and what it stands for and you have a mass of activists inside America
ready to go to work destroying it from within.
My older brother joined the Rhodesian SAS (an off-shoot of the famed British SAS). He told
me that during their courses (in the early 1960’s), their military instructors told them
that the communists were trying to sneak their concepts into Western schools. Their aim
was to capture the minds of the youth. As my brother explained to me, “Western teachers
would be teaching their pupils communism – WITHOUT EVEN KNOWING IT!” My brother told me
this when I was young, and I never forgot it.
Look at America today. Look at the Universities which are a hotbed of pro-Socialist,
anti-American thinking. If you send your child to university, he/she will come out of their
completely brainwashed to hate the Western world and everything it stands for.
How many people today sit back and say to themselves: “The communists were indeed successful
in their subversion of Western Universities?” Few do. But that’s exactly what happened. The
communists actually moved forward on so very many fronts, but few have actually got enough
knowledge of history to know that it happened. They are waiting for the media to tell them,
and the media will not, because the media was among the first areas to be propagandised.
I said a while back that I think a guy like Noam Chomsky, is actually a communist. A number
of (young?) people jumped all over me for saying that.
A friend of mine in the USA, Jeff Nyquist, told me how he was studying for his PhD in Sociology
and how he then had a fall out with his professor who was a Marxist. Jeff could not accept this
man’s views and walked out. Jeff went on to say that he had lectured at the University of
California for some years and that the US “Intelligensia”, were mostly closet communists,
Marxists & Socialists.
Some months ago, an American wrote this to me: “Right now, throughout the English-speaking world,
the academic system, at least, is operating under a Marxist doctrine developed in the 1930s
called Popular Frontism, meaning an alliance of liberal (in the American sense), labor,
socialist and communist parties and organizations, all manipulated by the hard-core Marxists.
This means, in practice, that the Popular Front, when it has power, defines what forms of
opposition are allowed to exist.” Mike explained how intolerant this group is of ideas which
go against their way of thinking. Recently, a nuclear scientist, Dr Marvin Herndon, explained
on the Art Bell show how controlled scientific thinking is these days, and how new ideas are
suppressed using group-think methods.
I once read that the Russians spent tens of billions of dollars on propaganda. Propaganda is
disseminated via official and unofficial sources. It enters the media via clandestine contacts.
All countries do this, but nobody makes the time or effort that the Russians have. The Western
world’s media is so easy to access, and so uncontrolled, that it is a communist’s paradise. The
Western media is so effecient and powerful that if you can get a good story into it today,
it will be on every newspaper in the world within 24 hours.
You’ve heard Russian propaganda and you never even knew it. You hear it every day but don’t
know where it comes from. Let me give you some overt
examples. Take AIDS for instance. You know, the story that AIDS was invented as a weapon to
kill blacks or as a general “germ warfare” weapon gone wrong. The original story was floated
by the communists in East Germany by a Professor Segal. The story did so well that the KGB
then obtained permission to spread it worldwide. They planted it in various newspapers, and
off it went. According to a British scientist, Chapman Pincher (see his book: The Truth
about Dirty Tricks), the KGB got permission to launch a full disinformation campaign.
Disinformation is a special kind of propaganda which includes the manufacture of fake documents
and evidence. This is a KGB speciality. So you will see that there are people in America
who claim to have documents “proving” that America actually created AIDS! Don’t you believe it.
You are looking at first-class, high-quality, KGB propaganda. Most probably, every African
American believes it!
AIDS has such propaganda value that every communist has tried to use it for their own ends.
In South Africa, they claim it was invented by the whites here to wipe out all the blacks.
In Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe tried to use anthrax (which is naturally occuring there in cattle),
to try to claim that whites there were trying to oblierate all the blacks using anthrax! (That
story was something of a flop and nobody ever took it seriously). The Russians love playing
the race card at every twist and turn and they floated a story once that Britain and America
were developing an “Ethnic Weapon” to kill non-whites. That story was also something of a flop.
In South America, the Russians tried to stir up anti-American hatred by planting a story that
babies were being killed and their organs were being transplanted into the “children of the
rich”. It was one of the more extreme “rich versus poor” type of stories so beloved by the
communists which emphasised the “cruelty” of the “rich Americans”.
But then, there is the truly dangerous propaganda, the subtle stuff, like the things my brother
told me about when I was a kid. This is when ideas and concepts are slipped quietly into the
youthful mind intended to turn them into neo-Socialists, and semi-Communists without them knowing
it. This is what is happening all the time and its effects are tremendous.
Let me stop for a moment and define communist as I use it, because I am sure I am using it
correctly. I do not bother with the political label a person uses, because that is often
deceptive – deliberately so. A study of communism will show that communists have often
made quick changes whenever the heat was on in order to divert the anger which comes their
way. Communists are hardly ever good at full frontal confrontation. They prefer to sneak in
through the back door. Their philosophy is pretty bankrupt at best. Marx’s writings did not
set the world on fire. So they have to sneak their class warfare in through the back door most
of the time. Communists, even in the Soviet Union and China, NEVER were a majority. They claim
to be there for the people and the masses, but they themselves have ALWAYS been a small elitist
group. Their influence is clandestine, and their main method of moving forward is by way of
a wave of propaganda disseminated through agents and friends in the media.
Communism is basically a thesis propounded by Marx that there is a system of Organised Crime
called Capitalism. This system is run by the Rich for their own benefit and everyone else is
held in slavery under this system. Marx tried to “prove”, using his twisted thinking, and his
invented “facts”, that the Rich “exploit” the Poor. Marx tried to show that all workers were
short-changed for the work they did, and the Fat Cats were the ones benefiting from the system.
All of Marx’s fallacious economics is aimed at one thing: Overthrowing the current order, in order
to destroy the Rich and the powerful and to put Communists in their place. The Communists would be
the custodians of the people, and the communists would see to it that “fairness” would reign.
Capitalism, being by his definition, a system of Organised Crime, could not be tolerated. In its
place they would have “socialism” which is fair. Note however, that officially, there never has
been a truly “communist” society in the world. This is because Marx gets a bit vague. Socialism,
so he says, is a step towards a truly perfect society which he calls “communism”. He never gives
a timetable for when they will get there. It may be a thousand years or a million years, but, he
assures us, we will get there and it will be great!!!
So the basic elements of communism, economically, is to pit the poor against the rich – this is
Class Warfare. The aim is to stir up revolution and hatred. Now you can’t do that in a happy
society where people believe they have a stake and a future. So Marx then had to convince people
that they were actually being wronged. Hence he had to invent economic “theories” to try to boggle
people’s minds and to try and make them angry. What is cool about Marxism is that in any country
on Earth, the poor always outnumber the rich, and no doubt, Marx observed this. So, being a power-hungry
maniac, he no doubt figured that he could destroy the rich and put himself in their place, if only
he could motivate the poor to fight for him. So he went to great lengths inventing a relatively
credible-sounding pack of lies. This “intellectual exercise” of his had as its sole aim, the
creation of hatred. Marx wanted enough hatred to cause the common worker to want to murder his
boss and destroy the upper class. So he had to make things sound pretty bad. He had to make
people feel like they were in total slavery and without hope. He had to angle it so that destruction
of the existing order was the only way forward. Hence the famous dictum “Workers of the World Unite!
All you have to lose is your chains!” Its all very melodramatic and emotional, and that’s what it
was meant to be. Early communism was vicious. Here in South Africa we have the 2nd oldest
communist party in the world. Their propaganda used to refer to “the Capitalist Robber System”.
In the 1920’s when the communists used their hate speech openly it made them lots of enemies.
So as the years went by they softened their approach. They saw that calling people “Capitalist
Lackeys” did not buy them many followers.
So then they started doing things in a subtle way. One of their early projects in the 1950s and
1960s was to go after university students. Consider for example, Bill Clinton. Clinton was at
Oxford University which was a hotbed of communist activity. Clinton organised anti-Vietnam
demonstrations. Then, there is the strange, murky and unexplained visit to Moscow in the winter
of 1969. We then find a young, enthusiastic and determined Clinton telling people that he was
going to be the President one day. What did young Bill Clinton know that we don’t? Did young Bill
strike some kind of deal in Russia? Did he get something like a “I’ll help you if you help me” kind
of deal? Consider the “Slick Willy” angle. No matter what happens, Bill survives. There is that
infamous Clinton death list of people who died under strange circumstances. How do you know
that Clinton’s guardian angel isn’t the KGB?
Jeff Nyquist told me that in the 1980s he attended a lecture where a hardcore American Marxist
spoke of how they were going to elect America’s first Socialist President. Jeff noted that
when Clinton was elected the Marxists were very happy. Jeff once referred to Clinton in an
article on WorldNetDaily, as a traitor and an agent of Moscow.
Prior to the 1992 elections, an American friend sent me a booklet written by a USAF pilot, Mark
Price, wherein he showed Bill and Hillary’s Marxist background. Hillary once donated $5,000 of
her own to Marxist terrorists in Latin America. Bill Clinton praised the Italian communists.
In fact, Bill Clinton’s philosophy, “The Third Way”, is actually what one might call “The New
Communism”. The Third Way is probably derived from the “Third Road”. The Hungarians rebelled
in the 1950’s against the Soviets. So the Russian army went in and re-conquered Hungary. However,
the Soviets decided to install a softened form of communism. It was known as “The Third Road”.
Nowadays you will see Clinton and Blair and most of Europe are advocates of the “The Third Way”.
There is another name for “The Third Way”. It is called, “Selfmanagement Socialism”. This is
a type of communism wherein the communists use businesses to fulfill their grandiose promises.
So instead of taxing the businesses to death and routing it through a powerful central government,
the communists instead get businesses to give the money directly to the causes which they, the
communists, support. It is a simpler system, and it does not suffer from the inefficiencies of
central government. As with all they do, they implement it using a wave of propaganda aimed
at making businesses aware of their “social responsibility (guilt).” I should say, guilt is part
of the communist’s psychological weaponry and it is used to good effect as a peaceful way
of stealing from you.
This all harkens back to the basic communist premise that the Rich are criminals. They now try
to say “You took from society, now give some of it back”. In a very subtle way, they are implying
that businesses are actually criminal operations. So nowadays you will see communists everywhere
speaking of “social responsibility” and the “damage to the environment”. This new approach is
great, and people love it. Here in South Africa, Mandela, walks around saying to business
“You must build this, you must do that, you must give back some of your profits, etc”. The
businesses are only too pleased. Little do they realise that they are now fulfilling the
promises of communists.
Tony Blair was a young communist radical. Now he is the Prime Minister of England and he is
doing to England what Clinton tried to do to America. Clinton’s Socialist healthcare plan may
have failed, but he aids the spread of communism in many ways.
One of these is to demonise the USA at every opportunity.
The Russians were the first to start portraying Colonialism as a sort of “Evil Empire”. As with
all communist advances, prior to the attack, and during the attack, they send out massive waves
of propaganda across the world demonising those whom they wish to destroy. This is one of the
secrets for those who know. Watch where the Left aims its propaganda machine because that is
the group next in line for destruction. The entire Soviet Bloc put out anti-Colonial propaganda
all the time, and they taught blacks in Africa how to continue the trend. This massive wave of
propaganda was aimed at showing that colonialism was “exploiting” the poor black Africans. Again,
you can see the common thread. To this day you will hear stories from Africa about the “damage”
which “Multinational Corporations” (i.e. American, British or European businesses), do to Africa.
You will hear them attacking Shell Oil or some other major company. LonRho used to be a favourite
target. LonRho was very active in Africa and often LonRho was the only business which managed to
get things working, so it was a favourite target. But all big businesses come under attack.
Nowadays of course they are demonising white farmers. Same thing. White commercial farmers are
now considered thieves and “exploiters”, etc, etc. Apartheid was of course the cherry on the top.
They blew Apartheid out of all proportion to what it really was. Having actually lived in South
Africa for more than 20 years, I’d say that there have probably been more exaggerations and lies
told about Apartheid than any political system that has ever existed.
Let me stop for a second, because the Reader must surely be thinking none of what I am saying
is possible. But think back. Consider all the stories of “exploitation” in Zimbabwe, South Africa
and Africa. Then look at history. The “theory” said: “Whites are stealing from blacks – get rid
of the whites and everything will be fine”. That was done. The best example is Mozambique where
virtually all the whites fled overnight. The blacks were left with everything in tact. What
happened? The economy collapsed overnight and they became the poorest nation on Earth. Then they
said, “Get rid of Apartheid and all will be well in South Africa”. Well, I live here, and I can
tell you little changed. Some blacks moved into white suburbs. Big deal. The main suburbs of
major South African cities are still white. Blacks still live in the townships. In fact,
FORCED REMOVALS (you know, that horror of Apartheid), actually took place under ANC rule.
There was a place, not far from where I live, where blacks built shacks illegally. It
was causing a problem. The ANC asked them to leave. They would not. Eventually they sent in
Police and municipal workers and they destroyed their shacks, loaded them up and carted them
out. The blacks were screaming and saying this was “worse than Apartheid”. It made the news
here in South Africa, but as usual, CNN never carries these things.
Look at Zimbabwe. The blacks are “getting their land back”. The finest pickings go to Mugabe’s
top people. What they will NEVER tell you is that the biggest landowners in Zimbabwe are black
politicians. You never hear that in the media.
There are two points I wish to get across. One, all the propaganda you hear which is anti-Colonialist,
anti-Apartheid, anti-American, anti-Western, anti-Capitalist, anti-White, anti-Male, etc tells you only
ONE SIDE OF THE STORY. You never hear the full story because if you did, you would go “ho hum”
and you’d see there is little to get worked up about. The other, is that all this propaganda is
aimed at making people angry and making people believe that others are doing things out of HATE.
This is the subtle message which is being put into the minds of young people. They are being taught
that everything America and the West stand for, is the result of criminal actions by their forefathers
and was motivated by HATRED. Sit back for a moment, and look at things from another viewpoint.
You will be hard pressed to find a major news story
which goes something like “White people did something good for black folks.” Why? Because that
does not suit the communists and their fellow travellers and helpers.
On the back of the Marxist Class warfare, they added Race Warfare, to give their message that
extra bang for their buck. And what a bang it buys them. Sneak Racial issues into anything and
you immediately arouse strong emotions (that old problem which breaks up empires remember!?).
Race hatred can destroy the cohesion of empires and countries, and the commies know it.
So although you may find that black/Asian race relations are worse than black/white race relations
(I’m speaking of Africa), you will find that never makes the news. The “politically correct” game
is the one where whites wrong blacks. All other variations on the theme, are not of interest to
those who have a pre-ordained agenda.
Young people are being conditioned to believe that capitalism is “oppressive” and “exploitive”,
etc. But this is not the full story – not by a mile. That is because they only put out selected
facts, aimed at getting their ideas into your head. They skirt around all the other things which
don’t work for them. They will always say capitalism is expoitive and even “oppressive”. What
they never tell you is that capitalism is not just for the rich. Indeed, small businesses are
a wonderful part of capitalism and they employ masses of people and provide a lot of growth.
They will never tell you that a poor kid can become rich one day. They will never tell you
that the best hope for a poor African country is to encourage small business and entrepreneurship.
NEVER! They will never tell you that under Colonial rule, or at the height of Apartheid,
that there were blacks who were self-made multimillionaires.
They will tell you: socialism is the best hope for Africa and to pull it off we need
trillions of dollars in aid from you RICH WESTERN NATIONS.
Another, newer variation on the old communist theme is the one about Debt repayment. The “Rich”
countries are now encouraged to write off enormous debts to the poor countries. Once more,
I notice that here in Africa, the Marxists back this one to the hilt because it adds to the
validity of what they have been saying all along, namely that the Rich are thieves and derived
their wealth by stealing from the poor. So Debt write off is seen as the “return of stolen goods”.
Westerners on the other hand probably see this as a generous gesture on their part. But here the
insinuation is that the Rich nations became rich by riding on the backs of the poor nations and
now they must be so kind as to give them some “relief” from their suffering.
They tell you socialism is fair. Bunk! The implication is that capitalism is unfair! What rubbish!
What could be fairer than being rewarded for your initiative and hard work. If you work hard, surely
you should get more? Well, capitalism does that. Capitalism rewards innovation, hard work, dedication,
etc. Socialism, now that’s a load of unfair bunk. The lazy get the same as the hardworking! Now that
is unfair! The hard working are taxed to death for what? For succeeding? Anyone who lives in a
socialist system soon realises that hard work and effort are penalised, and this is a great
demotivating influence on people.
Why should everyone be paid the same? Consider athletics. People strive hard to get the Gold medal.
It is a sign of their success. Only one person gets it. There is a clear cut aim for one person
to succeed and to tower above others. Why then should that not apply in the real world? Why shouldn’t
some people get lots of money as a reward for doing something great?
In fact, that has always been the logical approach. Reward someone with talent. Give them money,
give them power and they will go on to do greater things still! Human society, Western society,
has operated like this since the dawn of time. Read Julius Caesar’s Gallic wars and discover,
to your amazement, capitalism alive and well in Gaul and the Roman Empire. People did things for
profit back then, and societies worked and developed. The same cannot be said for socialist rubbish.
Socialism is marketed as being moral and high-minded. Bunk. Socialism is fine when people are ill,
or old, etc and have no income. But to market socialism as a solution to a country’s economic
problems is insanity.
Colonialism was merely capitalism in action on the African continent. Colonialism gave Africa the
best economic progress it has ever known. Colonialism never needed billions or trillions of dollars
in funding. It made profits, it reinvested them, and countries moved forward. Not one “liberated”
nation ever achieved any economic growth even close to what it had under colonial rule. That
is what is so brilliant about capitalism. It is self-financing. Profits are invested wisely to
generate more profits. It causes development. Socialism is madness. Under socialism you take
hard-earned profits and throw it into a bottomless pit from whence it will never return. Hence,
no economic growth. Should I even be explaining this to anyone? Socialism is nothing short of madness
and insanity, but it is marketed by intellectuals and the media and of course the communists as
being “moral” and “helping the poor”, etc. What a load of bunk. The reality is, the poor will now
be poorer and hungrier than ever before. That is exactly what has happened, is happening and
will continue to happen until people wake up to the realities of this world.
Capitalism, the great Thief is not a thief. It is the only rational path forward. The Western world,
through colonialism, brought Africa the best years of its life.
The Marxists, and their converts in the intellgensia in America (who clearly need a good dose of
reality sometime), are doing their best to spread a message which originates from Marx and Lenin,
that the white race, originating from Europe, are planet-wide plunderers, murderers and thieves.
Yet, the creations of these people can be seen in North and South America and Africa. You can
see the cities, the development, the conquest of disease, etc. For all the “crimes” of the West,
we more than made up for it with the good we did in return.
Here in Africa, for every one black person who died at our hands, we probably saved the lives
of 100,000. Whites saved entire tribes from starvation, brought them medicine, and taught them for
free. There is much good that we did, and there is very little wrong with the systems we brought here.
And no, people were not motivated at every twist and turn by hatred. The hatred, and the concept
of hatred, stems, at its source, from Marx and from attempts at proving that the entire Western
world are basically murderers and thieves. This comes from a totally one-sided, twisted look at
history without considering all the facts of the case.
Yet, this is precisely what the intelligensia of American universities are pushing. It stuns me
that Clinton could give a speech at Berkley University, and say the most putrid things about
America, and have people hanging on every word.
I’m not saying the past was perfect, but people have often made difficult choices.
History is complex and murky. The general
result, was progress whereever Westerners dared to go. And that is an undeniable fact
of history. What did all the so-called high-minded, high-moralled Marxists, socialists and communists leave
in their wake? They left ruined countries. Nations were flattened to the ground, as Zimbabwe is
fast becoming, and as South Africa will be one day. Piles of corpses lie in every land and
on every continent where they went with their “fair” solutions. It did not matter if
white people or black people fell for this pack of lies because the result was the same.
Economic stagnation and then collapse. Whatever a country’s past might have been, their
“fair” solution brought it to a level of destruction never known in its past.
What stuns me is how many young Americans are being indoctrinated to think that these “fair”
solutions actually hold water and should be implemented. That is truly scary.
Etherzone Articles by Jan Lamprecht
Communists in South Africa’s Government (includes the story of why Mandela went to jail)
Your Survival Guide to Semantic Warfare. (Understanding the enemies of the West)
Archive of Jan Lamprecht’s articles on Etherzone.
Links & Products:
My Website is: www.AfricanCrisis.org
I can be contacted by e-mail at: [email protected]
My book : “Government by Deception” – Psychopolitics in Southern Africa is now
on sale in the USA. It can now be bought directly from Etherzone’s home page.
Click here to read comments by famous Americans who have read the book.