WARNING: This is Version 1 of my old archive, so Photos will NOT work and many links will NOT work. But you can find articles by searching on the Titles. There is a lot of information in this archive. Use the SEARCH BAR at the top right. Prior to December 2012; I was a pro-Christian type of Conservative. I was unaware of the mass of Jewish lies in history, especially the lies regarding WW2 and Hitler. So in here you will find pro-Jewish and pro-Israel material. I was definitely WRONG about the Boeremag and Janusz Walus. They were for real.
Original Post Date: 2003-02-01 Published on: ETHERZONE.COM  Posted By: Jan
SubTitle: Ganging up on the USA
For some years I have been wondering if the Russians had not perhaps changed their strategy
for taking the USA down. I was very curious when the Western world, especially the USA, got
involved in Yugoslavia, a former communist country. The Russians sat by quietly.
If one looks at the history of communist conflicts against the USA, then the biggest communist
victory ever was Vietnam. In Vietnam, the USA went off to defend a country against communist
insurgency. In so doing it got itself caught up in a war far from home in conditions, which
did not favour mechanised and automated warfare. In Vietnam, America was lured into a fight
that could not be won without a lot of bloodshed.
As Colonel Lunev, a Russian defector revealed in the 1990’s, the Russians spent more money on
propaganda during that war than they did on actual fighting. This caused a lot of dissension in
America, and it also harmed the military. Communists, like Bill Clinton, were hard at work
holding “peace protests” aimed at undermining the US Military. The Mass Media, being subtley
influenced by enemy propaganda, showing the apparent cruelty of soldiers in Vietnam, did much
to undermine US faith in their own government.
As I watch this lead up to the attack on Iraq, it troubles me that a lot of the patterns of
the Vietnam war seem to be repeating themselves.
I have been wondering, ever since Yugoslavia, if the Russians were using their old allies as
bait in an attempt at getting the USA involved in another war where they could spring a
strategic trap on the USA. I have been wondering if the Russians and their allies are
hoping for another “Vietnam”.
This did not happen in Yugoslavia. I wondered after 9/11 if it might happen in Afghanistan.
In Afghanistan the Russians instead proved to be extremely friendly towards the USA. They were
key players in the creation of the Northern Alliance that played such a key role in the victory
there. The Russians were only too happy to give orders to the Northern Alliance to co-operate
with America. Were it not for that, America might have had a lot tougher time in Afghanistan.
But in this instance, it seems, Russian and American aims were pretty much the same. Anyway,
the Russians did not do it for free. The pay-off for them was a much greater influence in
Europe – where they are trying to get all their old friends into NATO so that NATO will
be neutralised from within.
But Iraq is quite different to Yugoslavia and Afghanistan. Here we have a terrorist,
warmongering state that has a long history of being linked to Russia. On the plus side for
America, fighting in the desert suits mechanised forces. So a quick American victory
is almost assured.
Of course, Saddam has not been sitting still. We now know that he has become much more adept
at hiding his chemical and biological programs by making use of trucks to move them around.
We are also hearing now that maybe nuclear weapons will have to be used in order to destroy
some of his underground facilities. Yikes! That goes to show that Saddam has not been sitting
still for the last decade.
Clearly he has given up hope in fighting the USA on open ground. So he is hoping to fight in
the cities instead, most especially Baghdad. He is hoping that Baghdad can be turned into
another “Stalingrad” and that US forces can be made to bleed there. Given the nature of US
weapons, I would imagine that they can just go in there and level everything to the ground.
If they do so, (in order to save the lives of their own troops), then they may cause a lot
of civilian casualties.
Communists of course like blood – lots of it. Because bloodshed raises emotions in all people
and lots of bloodshed can of course be used for propaganda purposes.
Recent reports say that the USA will fire 800 cruise missiles at Iraq in two days to try to
overwhelm them and to make them give up. I am not sure if this is disinformation, or whether
this will really be the military strategy. Is it wise to say such things up front? Is it wise
to give the enemy warning of what is coming their way? Won’t they just keep their heads down
for 2 days and then continue on like before? I am rather troubled by the disclosure of this
particular strategy. It is never wise to tell people what you are going to do in a war.
Take the British in WWII for example. Bombing by the Germans only served to stiffen their
resolve. On the other hand, the Iraqis do not seem to have a very high morale, so maybe it
will work.
The big question on my mind, as usual, is whether the Russians will get lucky enough to actually
spring a strategic trap on the USA. It is worth remembering, that in the history of warfare,
virtually no army gives battle knowing it will lose. When Generals fear they will lose, they will
normally retreat or hold back. Thus, at a grand level, a lot of warfare is all about getting the
other side to commit to a fight that is carefully stacked against them. Thus, when US Military
planners are planning these campaigns and assessing the situation they must also be looking out
for particular problems and traps that can trip them up and cause them a lot of casualties and
problems. So if a trap is to be sprung, then it must not be too obvious at first.
The thing which has me curious is whether George Bush’s aim of “going it alone” can be turned
against him. It appears to me the communists are trying hard to isolate the USA. This seems to
me to be the “Grand Strategy” on their part. On the one hand we have “peace movements”
springing up everywhere on a scale which is quite daunting. Even the ruling African National
Congress in South Africa is planning a mass protest against the US attack on Iraq. Around the
world we have seen some very large peace protests, some of which amaze me, like the one in
Italy where 400,000 people took part. There must be some serious money behind these protests.
Then it seems as if there are quite a lot of divisions within the USA itself, a lot like during
the Vietnam war. The Liberals and Democrats are once more working against the government
and undermining the national will and morale.
But the thing which concerns me the most is the manner in which a number of countries are
turning on the USA. I am all for a country standing its ground and saying they must “go it alone”.
We did that sort of thing over here decades ago. But my concern is whether this can be used
against America.
I often chat with friends and co-workers here in South Africa about Americans. They all know
I have a very firm pro-American stance. But one comment which comes up time and again about
Americans is that “Americans are arrogant”. I hear this even from people who are basically
pro-Western in their outlook and who will not deny that many good things come from America.
I can see that there are many people who would not mind seeing Americans get a bloody nose
because they feel Americans need to be taken down.
Then of course, you also have the Third World types, who have been inundated with the belief
that America is a country of elitists who go around the world “stealing” from everyone. Then
there are the Muslims who believe America is a country of decadence.
It does not matter which, if any, of these perceptions are true or not. What is crucial is that
these perceptions are out there. Some are merely the result of jealousy. Others are due to
stupidity. Others are due to the carefully crafted lies of your enemies. But the danger is whether
countries around the world can actually be turned against America.
So the thing which concerns me the most, prior to this war, is not the actual fighting, nor
whether America will win easily or not – but rather the perceptions of the world about
America and whether people can be turned against the USA.
We whites in Africa were politically isolated before the communists could actually attack us
and destroy us. This is the key. The basic communist strategy has always been to mobilise the
masses against the few. The USA makes up 5% of the world’s population. Since the USA is so
strong, destroying it is not a task which the Russians or the Chinese can do alone. Especially
not without the support of Europe. Europe can also pack a hell of a punch if it has time to
mobilise itself.
So in my view, the USA can only be attacked if it can be isolated. But to do so, it would be
necessary to turn much of the world, including much of Europe against it.
Recently we saw the French, Germans and Russians openly opposing the US attack on Iraq. On the
plus side, other European nations stood on the USA’s side. But it is quite incredible seeing
major nations, the likes of France and Germany opposing what the USA is doing – and one hopes
that this pattern does not spread. There is no doubt going to be a “diplomatic war” as the
USA tries to find allies. The real question will be whether the USA can keep its allies once
the fighting in Iraq starts – especially if it becomes bloody.
It is interesting to watch how our local communists are rallying against the USA. President
Mbeki had a meeting with Tony Blair and put forth the case once more that there is no reason
for a war against Iraq. The South African foreign Minister, Nkosasana Zuma also spoke out about
the negative effects of the war.
South Africa might not be a major country in the world, but it does head the Non-Aligned
Movement. The so-called Non-Aligned Movement is really dominated by the left. It has a large
membership of Third World nations, including India. It represents a large portion of the
Earth’s population. Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe used to head the Non-Aligned Movement for many
years. You can rest assured that South Africa and Zimbabwe will use their status in the
Non-Aligned Movement to turn people in many nations against the USA.
Then there is that world icon, Nelson Mandela, who has been acclaimed by liberals and fools
as being the greatest statesman in the world. This week he launched into another vitriolic
attack against President Bush. He has implied that Bush is a racist!! This is the second time
I have heard him say it. He says that President Bush is ignoring the UN because the UN is
run by a black man (Kofi Anan)! Mandela calls the USA arrogant. What is interesting is that
this old hard-core communist insider goes around saying the USA’s actions “will lead to a
holocaust”. His attacks on President Bush are very strong, and he is making this very
personal. Considering the stature of Mandela as a communist, and that he must be deep on
the inside – since he has visited both Russia and China many times and been decorated by them –
I think his actions show clearly what the communist world is hoping for. Mandela also implied
that President Bush is stupid – saying that he cannot think straight.
It appears to me that the communists of the world, while jumping up and down, in mock
angst, are actually hoping the USA will go ahead with its attack on Iraq. I think they want
the USA to attack so that they can then try to use their influence to rally the people of
the world against the USA.
It is entirely possible that they will fail. But, if they should manage to succeed in some
manner and win more countries to their viewpoint, especially once the fighting starts, when
they can claim that the USA carried out mass atrocities – then there could be trouble. The
communists have always had to isolate those whom they wish to destroy. They have always moved
forward on the basis of mass movements and “demonstrations”.
Even if the USA wins the war in Iraq quickly and easily, it is this fall-out that we must
watch. I keep wondering if the communists will get lucky with Iraq and be able to turn the world
against the USA, because if they do, then the USA is going to be under all forms of pressure
the likes of which it has never experienced in its existence.
Israel is currently experiencing that sort of pressure. It has taken the communists decades
to create that situation. America could be next.
Many people think the communists don’t have the nerve to attack. I do not believe this. I believe
they will use military force once they are certain that they have enough support in the rest of
the world. The Russians for example, could intervene in the Middle East under the pretense of
saving the Iraqi people from genocide and mass cruelty by the Americans or some such lie.
I keep wondering whether Mandela and other communists are hinting that this could turn into
“it” – the big one – the start of a World War. The next few months promise to be very interesting.
Etherzone Articles by Jan Lamprecht
Arming Blacks in Zimbabwe
Iraq’s Baffling Moves
The Secret Code of Terrorists
Your Survival Guide to Semantic Warfare. (Understanding the enemies of the West)
The WorldWide War on White People
Click here to see the Archive of Jan Lamprecht’s articles on Etherzone.
Links & Products:
For the most graphic farm murder photos on the Internet go to: www.AfricanCrisis.org/photos.asp
My Website is: www.AfricanCrisis.org
I can be contacted by e-mail at: [email protected]
My book : “Government by Deception” – Psychopolitics in Southern Africa is now
on sale in the USA.
Click here to read comments by famous Americans who have read the book.