[By “Right Wing”, Mugabe also includes outright Liberals such as Tony Leon, etc. Yes you old Communist bastard… If only we had teeth… what a joy it would be to bite a chunk out of you, you arrogant old scumbag! Sadly… we have none and we have to watch you get away with everything.

Note how the ANC supports Mugabe’s “struggle for the liberation of Zimbabwe”. That’s their wording… Liberation of Zimbabwe? Liberation from WHAT? From WHITES? That can be the only answer… And if the ANC feels that way about Zimbabwe… then what exactly does that mean for us in S.Africa??? We’re gonna be on the chopping block too… Our asses are gonna be kicked!!!

I noted that there seem to be hints coming from our socialist trash… that the “Right Wing” is behind a “Third Force” in Zimbabwe… What junk. The closest thing to a “Third Force” was me!!! And I failed miserably!! Mugabe’s agents came to me, asking to “join the war”… and I had to admit that there was no war… (Sadly). The Black Zimbabweans often asked me about the “Rhodesian Arms Caches”. They seemed to live under a mistaken belief that Whites had stashed away huge arms caches and now they wanted access to our guns… so they could wage war against Mugabe. There was much talk among the black Zimbabweans about the Rhodesian arms caches… which supposedly were hidden by whites on farms. I had to tell them… that no such thing existed. I have *NEVER* heard of any White Rhodesians who ever claimed or hinted at having stashed away arms. Instead, I know we were all forced to hand in our weapons at the end of the war. My own parents handed in our shotgun and hunting rifle – which could not by any stretch of the imagination be regarded as weapons of war.

No… The Whites don’t have arms caches… anywhere in Southern Africa.

Regarding the “Third Force”…
For those who don’t know… the ANC carried out violence in South Africa when De Klerk was around and they blamed it on a mysterious “Third Force” which the Afrikaners supposedly controlled. There never was such a thing. But they loved pretending it existed because then they, the ANC could murder blacks who did not support them and then blame it on the whites. I put forward my comments on this in my book: Govt by Deception. If they start talking about a “Third Force” in Zimbabwe… then it will no doubt be in an attempt at pretending that Whites in Africa are waging an armed struggle in Zim. IF ONLY IT WERE TRUE… I would be shouting it from the roof tops… But the sad reality is the opposite. It doesn’t exist. As I mentioned last year… the ANC railroaded what little co-operation there was between myself and the blacks in Zim… and I never EVER heard of anything else which suggested that anything real actually existed. There was only one white person walking around calling for armed conflict – and that was me. I will admit it – It would be great if I had my own army… but sadly I have none! The only “army” is me… and the deadliest weapon I have is my website!! That, I’m afraid, is the sad, miserable, rotten truth about my state of affairs. I would gladly die in front of Mugabe or Mbeki’s firing squad… if I had a real army. Hey… I’d like to at least die for a reason. But damn it… to be innocent… and to have no resources – that sucks!!! Jan]

Cape Town – South Africa’s rightwing was not a newcomer to demonising Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, said the African National Congress on its internet site on Friday.

The ruling party argues – under a discourse entitled “the sociology of the public discourse in South Africa – “the fact… is that the rightwing in our country is not a newcomer to the struggle against the government of Zimbabwe.”

The ANC included the Democratic Alliance and the Solidarity trade union as part of this “rightwing”.

The ANC mentioned an article in the Cape Times newspaper which reported that the Congress of South African Trade Unions had shunned the support of Solidarity and the DA for its campaign against human rights abuses by the Zimbabwe government.

The ANC said: “This rightwing opposed the struggle for the liberation of Zimbabwe.

“Even then, it was forthright in its hostility to, and its demonisation of, President Mugabe.

Land redistribution

“It scaled up its long-standing opposition to President Mugabe and the Zimbabwe government in response to the forcible process of land redistribution in that country.

“This process sought to redress the colonial legacy of land dispossession that had left the most-productive land in the hands of a tiny white settler colonial population and absentee landowners.

“In this context, our domestic rightwing, which was and is committed to the defence of white minority interests in Zimbabwe in its own interest, took advantage of various negative political and economic elements in the actions of the government of Zimbabwe to legitimise the struggle it had waged for many decades to defeat the Zimbabwe liberation movement.

“As part of that attempted legitimisation, and in the most sickening fashion, it now presents itself as the champion of the political and economic rights of the very same African masses whose liberation it had opposed.”

Temporary alliances

The column, which is edited by ANC secretary-general Kgalema Motlanthe, went on to say: “Understandably, and consistent with their strategy in the battle to set the national agenda, it was perfectly natural that the DA and Solidarity should express support for the actions of Cosatu directed at achieving objectives the rightwing had been pursuing for some decades.”

The ANC noted: “The point of all this is that the rightwing will continue to be greatly delighted to enter into temporary… alliances with those who oppose our movement (the ANC alliance), even on single issues, provided that such opposition reinforces its interventions in the battle of ideas.

“This is one of the important features of the sociology of the public discourse in our country.”

Edited by Iaine Harper

Source: News24.Com
URL: http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/Pol…/p>